Woah Citra and Uncharted Territory by Magnify Brewing

Woah Citra and Uncharted Territory by Magnify Brewing Company

Seems like there is not a bigger lightning rod brewery than Magnify. There are just so many local haters and the hate is directed at the owner. Apparently, it is due to belief that he’s a trust-fund kid that was set up by his parent’s wealth. And to boot, he has a strong pompous streak. First of all, I get that same feedback from a few of my friends as well. All I can say is that there are a lot of wealthy and no so nice people out there. Therefore, it’s your prerogative if you choose not give these people a dime of your money. Yet beer, is just beer. Maybe it unjustly influences your opinion of beer? Almost like a musician that spews their political views on stage. Just shut up and sing.

Anyway, the brewery had a triple can release two weeks ago and they set off a firestorm of hype over Peak of Ripeness. They billed it as a juicy, New England-style IPA. With those adjectives being tossed around, locals beset on the brewery. I showed up shortly after opening on Saturday and they had sold out of Peak of Ripeness. I grabbed a four-pack of these two beers and promptly split them with a friend.

Uncharted Territory IPL and Woah Citra IPA by Magnify Brewing

(C) 2016 popsonhops

Woah Citra
Tasting: August 15, 2016
Style: Farmhouse IPA
ABV: 8.0%
Beer #: 994

The brewery does a “Woah” series of single hop beers and I’ve heard a lot of good things about this beer. Since it’s billed as a farmhouse IPA, think IPA meets funky barnyard yeast. The funkiness mutes the citrus a bit but in a complimentary way. Haven’t had Gravitational Waves yet but outside of Carton and Kane one of the better New Jersey offerings…91 points.

Uncharted Territory
Tasting: August 15, 2016
Style: Lager
ABV: 6.5%
Beer #:995

To me, the benchmark for hoppy lagers is Jack’s Abby. Therefore, I’d say by comparison, Uncharted Territory comes up way short. Seems like it just doesn’t have any pizazz. While it’s entirely drinkable, it doesn’t have any distinguishing features. No oak influence and no discernible hop features. 86 points – only because it’s drinkable.

Share it!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Brooklyn Lager & Brooklyn IPA

Brooklyn Lager and Brooklyn IPA

Beer #: 834 & 835

My wife has a cousin that lives in Seattle and she hasn’t seen him in nearly thirty years. A couple of weeks ago, he emailed out of the blue that he is coming out for the World Series and has three extra tickets to all three games at CitiField. It was a proud and fulfilling time to be there with my two sons. I witnessed their passion for baseball ignite right in front of my eyes. I wish the outcome of the series was different – but the experience was priceless.

My three trips to CitiField included a chance to have a single beer each night and I chose a couple of offerings from Brooklyn Brewing – Brooklyn Lager and Brooklyn IPA. I thought the beer was made in Brooklyn but the can revealed that it was made in Utica, New York. I assume as a contract brewing arrangement.

I’d say the atmosphere and my mood certainly would bolster my opinions of both beers but I will also say that both had a muddle hop profile that would keep my opinion from getting carried away. I’d put Brooklyn Lager at 85 points and Brooklyn IPA a tick ahead at 86. Both drinkable.

Share it!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Yuengling & Blue Moon Summer Wheat

Drain Pours

© 2015 popsonhops

Tasting (or so I thought): September 3, 2015
Beer # 796 & 797

A Pair of Summer Wheat offerings

A friend says that he avoids bringing beer to my house and will bring wine instead. He says it would be like trying to buy paint brushes for Picasso. I appreciate the compliment – at least I think its a compliment. I prefer to share my beer with my guests. While the two Summer Wheat suspects sitting in my sink weren’t meant for me – they were left overs from a dinner party. Someone brought them to enjoy and I hope they enjoyed the company more than the beer.

I haven’t had either Summer Wheat, here it goes.

Really is watery and light on many flavors. I get an off banana yeasty flavor and cardboard. In a light but offensive way there is some face twisting bitterness. Nothing discernible or pleasant. Which beer am I talking about? Both. Oddly they are nearly identical in a very bad way. Each earns 59 points.

Share it!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Hopstitution by Jack’s Abby Brewing

Tasting(s): September 9 – 10, 2014
Style: Lager
Beers #: 603, 604 & 605

Hopstitution Extra Pale Lager by Jack's Abby Brewing Framingham, Massachusetts

©2014 popsonhops

While the photo appears to be three bottles of the same beer – it isn’t. Each beer pictured utilizes the same base beer known as Hopstitution but each of these three bottles has the nuance of a different hop profile. Jack’s Abby’s website explains the reasoning behind the difference:

Most hops are bought under contracts which are signed two or three years in advance. If you have a new beer that becomes popular you are often unable to brew anymore of it as there is no source for the hops. We occasionally get opportunities to acquire small quantities of specialty hops that are enough for one batch of beer, but no more.

We have decided to create a new 5.5% abv Extra Pale Lager(XPL) that we are calling Hopstitution. The idea is that the base beer will always remain the same but there will be a new batch every 4-8 weeks that will use new hops. This will allow us to feature hops that we would otherwise not be able to make use of.

Not much to indicate that these are different beer except the marking on the back side of the label:

Hopstitution Extra Pale Lager by Jack's Abby Brewing Framingham, Massachusetts

© 2014 popsonhops

First bottle is the bottle that does not indicate a hop. I’ll assume this is the base Hopstitution or just Hopstitution XPL. Briefly, I’ll say that this is an easy drinking lager – very crisp flavors. The hops are herbal, grassy and somewhat peppery with some lemon undertones. I can’t say that there is much of a malt backbone here. The base Hopstitution is an 87 with me.

From what I could find BAM! is the fifth and most recent release in the series. I believe I can make out a bottling date of 8/26/14. This chapter is an acronym for the hops used in this version: Bravo, Amarillo, and Mandarina. Definitely a discernible difference between BAM! and the base beer. The hops are kind of a muddled mess. But they really aren’t BAM in the Emeril sense at all. Very subdued in fact. To boot, I get some off banana and cracker-like grains. I’d call it ordinary and put this version of Hopstitution at 85 points.

Last but not least – Aussie Rules is up next and I found out that this version of Hopstitution is the fourth in the series. The hop twist – all Australian hop varieties: Ella, Topax and Galaxy hops. I’m familiar with Galaxy hops as they are used in a number of US beers and I read comparisons to the ever-popular Citra hop. Noticeably amped up hops here. Grapefruit, earthy, grassy and mildly dank. Not much sweetness underneath but Aussie Rules is crisp drink and I’ll put it at 88

Share it!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •